EcoOnline public idea portal

Submit your ideas or vote for ideas suggested by other users in the community.

All ideas will be reviewed before they are made visible.

Ideas added to the portal will always be considered for upcoming and ongoing projects.

For further information, please read the Idea portal Q&A.

Improve the risk module

When adding annual consumption or storage amounts, micro-grams show up as a default. This does not seem very logical and should be easy to fix. Most users probably select kg or liters for this. A change for this would reduce the amounts of clicks needed and give a better impression.
In addition the risk module is quite cumbersome, there are many pages that could be compressed to reduce the amount of clicks. Mandatory fields should be visualized to make the assessment more reliable. If you forget to fill out fields, the assessment still calculates your risks.
I see that the actual amount added to the assessment does not have an affect on the risk calculation but the drop-down list connected to it does - here you need to subjectively assess if your amounts are moderate or not. I would think that the actual amount was better suited to be included in the calculations.

  • Guest
  • Aug 27 2019
  • Recieved
Chemical Manager
  • Attach files
  • Admin
    Sigthrudur Osk Kristinsdottir commented
    October 04, 2019 07:20

    Når man skal angi årlig beholdning eller beholdning på lokasjon kommer mikro-gram opp som default. Dette oppleves som veldig lite hensiktsmessig og som noe som er raskt å fikse, de fleste bruker trolig liter eller kg her. ville redusert tastetrykk og gitt bedre inntrykk. I tillegg oppleves risikovurderingen som svært tungvindt å bruke, det er mange sider, men kunne vært komprimert til færre. Det burde også kommet tydelig frem hvilke felter som var obligatoriske å fylle ut, slik at vurderingen ble mer pålitelig. Hvis vi glemmer et felt vil det i dag fortsatt bli beregnet en risiko.

    I tillegg har jeg forstått det slik at mengden ikke er vesentlig for risikovurderingen, men det er derimot om man angir veldig lite, moderat eller mye som er avgjørende. Dette er svært subjektivt og man skulle tro reelle mengder var mye bedre grunnlag.

    Attachments Open full size

Related ideas