EcoOnline public idea portal

Submit your ideas or vote for ideas suggested by other users in the community.

All ideas will be reviewed before they are made visible.

Ideas added to the portal will always be considered for upcoming and ongoing projects.

For further information, please read the Idea portal Q&A.

Make two different functions for Regulatory lists and Voluntary lists.

Today Eco Archive has a function where the customer can search for matches in Legislation lists or voluntary helpful lists to figure out which products they have are under  regulation or which they could possibly substitute. My opinion is that we should separate and make two different functions here. One function would be called Regulatory lists and include only the lists we have which are actual lists with substances under regulation. The other function should include voluntary lists that are helpful for substitution such as SIN-list and PRIO-list. There is no regulation connected to these lists, why it is a bit confusing to include them under Legislation lists. I think it would be more educative and make more sense to separate them in two different tabs. Especially if we are to increase the amount of lists in the future for more markets.

  • Guest
  • Feb 21 2019
  • Recieved
  • Attach files
  • Guest commented
    September 01, 2020 09:48

    Yes, the voluntary lists should be reparated clarly from legal requirements.